|
|
This page lists several articles and book chapters
we believe to be of high quality. By selecting one you will be able to
open and view it.
Allen, K. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 62, 4-17.
Ambert, A., Adler, P., Adler, P., & Detzner, D.
(1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 57, 879-893.
Barritt, L., Bleeker, H., Beekman, T., & Mulderij,
K. (1985). A phenomenological approach. Researching Educational
Practice,
Conrad, C. (1982). Grounded theory: An alternative
approach to research in higher education. The Review of Higher
Education, 5, 255-261.
Geasler, M., Dannison, L., & Edlund, C. (1995).
Sexuality education of young children: Parental controls. Family
Relations, 44, 184-188.
Glesne, C. (1999). Being there: Developing
understanding through participant observation (395-413). Becoming
Qualitative Researchers 2nd Ed. Addison Wesley Longman.
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.
(1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research (57-72). In E. Guba
and Y. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
Mannis, V. (1999). Single mothers by choice.
Family Relations, 48, 121-128.
Nassar-McMillan, S. & Borders, D. (2002). Use of
focus groups in survey item development. The Qualitative Report, 7,
Nettles, S. & Robinson, F. (1998). Exploring the
dynamics of resilience in an elementary school. Center for Research on
the Education of Students Placed at Risk (No. 26). Washington, DC.
Peshkin, A. (2000). The nature of interpretation
in qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 29, 5-9.
Putney, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & Kelly, G.
(1999). Evolution of qualitative research methodology: Looking beyond
defense to possibilities. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 368-377.
Rezabek, R. (2000). Online focus groups:
Electronic discussions for research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research,
1.
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on
practice. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-10.
Sikes, P. (2000). Truth and lies revisited. British Educational Research
Journal, 26, 257-270.
Slayton, J. & Llosa, L. (2005). The use of
qualitative methods in large-scale evaluation: Improving the quality of
the evaluation and the meaningfulness of the findings. Teachers College
Record, 12, 2543-2565.
Talburt, S. (2004). Ethnographic responsibility
without the real. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 81-103.
Toma, J. (2000). How getting close to your subjects makes qualitative
data better. Theory into Practice, 39, 177-184.
van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Proulx, C., & Pasley, K.
(in press). A comparison of Internet and FTF qualitative methods to
study the relationships of gay men. Journal of GLBT Family Studies.
Walsh, A., Parker, E., & Cushing, A. (1999). How
am I gonna answer this one?: A discourse analysis of fathers’ accounts
of providing sexuality education for young sons. Canadian Journal of
Human Sexuality, 8, 103-114.
Walker, A. (1996). Couples watching television:
Gender, power, and the remote control. Journal of Marriage and the
Family, 58, 813-823.
Weitzman, E.
(2000). Software and qualitative research. In N.K. Denijan and Y.S.
Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Werner-Wilson, R. & Fitzharris, J. (2001). How can
mothers and fathers become involved in the sexuality education of
adolescents? Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention & education for Adolescents
& Children, 4, 49-59.
Wolcott, H. (1997). Ethnographic research in
education. Contemporary Methods for Research in Education, , 155-172.
|
